<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this the best open source CMS ever created?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/</link>
	<description>Simple is better than complex. Complex is better than complicated. &#124; @fedecarg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:38:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrea B.</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-7206</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrea B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-7206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if it&#039;s the best CMS ever created, but IMHO it&#039;s for sure the best CMS I&#039;ve ever used. I&#039;m using it since I found this article googling around searching an accessible CMS, one month and half ago, and I&#039;ve already made two projects, converting poor static sites into dinamic ones with success.

It was quite easy doing it (I was frightened at the idea of doing it with Joomla!) and the customers learned how to manage it in half a day. Plus, with its good user management, I could decide since the beginning what he can and can&#039;t see, beginning to macro areas and ending with single form fields.

Once you get into its logic (something that requires just some trying and look around through example website and docs) it&#039;s also quite easy to customize, having every FE and BE area its own template, which can be easily overrided without modifying the core.

Plus it has well written modules which integrate perfectly into the CMS structure, mantaining the BE aspect and layout (something that, e.g., Joomla! miss in most of its modules), so a costumer hasn&#039;t to learn and understand different control panels for each and every task he has to do, like e.g. inserting a photogallery (someone said Phoca gallery?!?).
Also modules are easy managed through BE area and you can browse and install them with just few clicks.

I&#039;m enthusiast about it, and I wanted to thank Federico because I discovered it just through his article :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if it&#8217;s the best CMS ever created, but IMHO it&#8217;s for sure the best CMS I&#8217;ve ever used. I&#8217;m using it since I found this article googling around searching an accessible CMS, one month and half ago, and I&#8217;ve already made two projects, converting poor static sites into dinamic ones with success.</p>
<p>It was quite easy doing it (I was frightened at the idea of doing it with Joomla!) and the customers learned how to manage it in half a day. Plus, with its good user management, I could decide since the beginning what he can and can&#8217;t see, beginning to macro areas and ending with single form fields.</p>
<p>Once you get into its logic (something that requires just some trying and look around through example website and docs) it&#8217;s also quite easy to customize, having every FE and BE area its own template, which can be easily overrided without modifying the core.</p>
<p>Plus it has well written modules which integrate perfectly into the CMS structure, mantaining the BE aspect and layout (something that, e.g., Joomla! miss in most of its modules), so a costumer hasn&#8217;t to learn and understand different control panels for each and every task he has to do, like e.g. inserting a photogallery (someone said Phoca gallery?!?).<br />
Also modules are easy managed through BE area and you can browse and install them with just few clicks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m enthusiast about it, and I wanted to thank Federico because I discovered it just through his article :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4799</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Federico,

you seemed very enthousiastic, a few months back, about typolight. And what about now are you still thinnking it&#039;s the best cms ever created? did you use or are you still using it? if not, what is your php choice for this kind of software.

i&#039;m asking you, because your reading is, for me, still very inspiring.

thanks for your answers]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Federico,</p>
<p>you seemed very enthousiastic, a few months back, about typolight. And what about now are you still thinnking it&#8217;s the best cms ever created? did you use or are you still using it? if not, what is your php choice for this kind of software.</p>
<p>i&#8217;m asking you, because your reading is, for me, still very inspiring.</p>
<p>thanks for your answers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federico</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4602</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Federico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 09:09:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4602</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Peter Thanks mate
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Peter Thanks mate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ann]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 06:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ jean
what is the name of this new CMS you talked about
I would be very interested to have more informations

Thanks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jean<br />
what is the name of this new CMS you talked about<br />
I would be very interested to have more informations</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all,
if you like typolight but not the way it is managed, you may want to join the first attempt to fork it.
René moser began a project on github:
http://github.com/opentypolight
here is the beginning of a roadmap:
http://twitter.com/opentypolight]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all,<br />
if you like typolight but not the way it is managed, you may want to join the first attempt to fork it.<br />
René moser began a project on github:<br />
<a href="http://github.com/opentypolight" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/opentypolight</a><br />
here is the beginning of a roadmap:<br />
<a href="http://twitter.com/opentypolight" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/opentypolight</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4555</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 05:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4555</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve seen a demo of a CMS that is supposed to be launched in the next weeks which is just amazing. It&#039;s clealy the next generation of CMS, a very intuitive interface, all the design in drag and drop, automatic keywords detections for SEO, online image editing, it is just amazing, they declare to be able to realize very complex sites fully customized in few hours and I trust them !!!

I know that the demo is reserved to beta testers right now but its far beyond everything I&#039;ve ever seen. And by the way includes already all the features you mention plus even more !]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen a demo of a CMS that is supposed to be launched in the next weeks which is just amazing. It&#8217;s clealy the next generation of CMS, a very intuitive interface, all the design in drag and drop, automatic keywords detections for SEO, online image editing, it is just amazing, they declare to be able to realize very complex sites fully customized in few hours and I trust them !!!</p>
<p>I know that the demo is reserved to beta testers right now but its far beyond everything I&#8217;ve ever seen. And by the way includes already all the features you mention plus even more !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mangirdas Skripka</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mangirdas Skripka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Typo3 uses old approach. Every day more and more popularity get the new way to manage the content, when all pages you can build from blocks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo3 uses old approach. Every day more and more popularity get the new way to manage the content, when all pages you can build from blocks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alphonse</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[alphonse]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i used typolight during 2 years but i&#039;m not sure it is the best cms created. it has some good points like &#039;content elements&#039;, something leo borrowed from typo3 and an accessible backend. But there&#039;s a lot of things i dislike:

o- it&#039;s _not_ a community driven project
o- it required an ugly signature in the source code (like typo3, phpwcms..)
o- leo&#039;s ask for denouncement: http://www.typolight.org/forum/message/50894.html is the point where i decided to no more use this piece of code
o- the core is too feature rich, too heavy for simple website and it not scales well for larger ones]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i used typolight during 2 years but i&#8217;m not sure it is the best cms created. it has some good points like &#8216;content elements&#8217;, something leo borrowed from typo3 and an accessible backend. But there&#8217;s a lot of things i dislike:</p>
<p>o- it&#8217;s _not_ a community driven project<br />
o- it required an ugly signature in the source code (like typo3, phpwcms..)<br />
o- leo&#8217;s ask for denouncement: <a href="http://www.typolight.org/forum/message/50894.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.typolight.org/forum/message/50894.html</a> is the point where i decided to no more use this piece of code<br />
o- the core is too feature rich, too heavy for simple website and it not scales well for larger ones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anto</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-4319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anto]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 15:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-4319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I use Drupal because I like some of the concepts which I can not find on other CMS&#039;. For instance, there is no separation between Front End and Back End in Drupal. I see no point at all in separating them. But all lot of CMS&#039; including TYPOLight are doing it.

But that is about the concept. About the support from the developer community, I think Drupal is at the bottom of the list. I think TYPOLight is better in this respect.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use Drupal because I like some of the concepts which I can not find on other CMS&#8217;. For instance, there is no separation between Front End and Back End in Drupal. I see no point at all in separating them. But all lot of CMS&#8217; including TYPOLight are doing it.</p>
<p>But that is about the concept. About the support from the developer community, I think Drupal is at the bottom of the list. I think TYPOLight is better in this respect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://blog.fedecarg.com/2009/05/13/is-this-the-best-open-source-cms-ever-created/#comment-3207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jorge]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fedecarg.com/?p=1650#comment-3207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me tell you why this is not better than Drupal in one word: Modules.

Drupal has hundreds of modules available that allows you to create whatever you can think of, and if it doesn&#039;t exist, there is a Content Creation Kit (CCK) for you to create your own stuff.

I saw this CMS looking for the best of them all and even though Federico is right when he says that is not an easy task to maintain procedural code, they have their reason why they did it that way.

If you have any other CMS to show me, I will be happy to see it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me tell you why this is not better than Drupal in one word: Modules.</p>
<p>Drupal has hundreds of modules available that allows you to create whatever you can think of, and if it doesn&#8217;t exist, there is a Content Creation Kit (CCK) for you to create your own stuff.</p>
<p>I saw this CMS looking for the best of them all and even though Federico is right when he says that is not an easy task to maintain procedural code, they have their reason why they did it that way.</p>
<p>If you have any other CMS to show me, I will be happy to see it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

